The short version: marketing is accountable for creating and qualifying demand, and sales is accountable for converting it into customers and revenue. Marketing builds awareness, runs campaigns, and generates and qualifies leads; sales works those leads, runs the conversations, and closes. Exactly where one hands off to the other depends on the go-to-market model: in outbound, product-led, and account-based motions the line moves, and the two teams often work the same accounts at once. Most of the avoidable friction shows up at that handoff, which is why defining who owns what, and who accepts responsibility at each step, matters more than any single job title.
This guide lays out the responsibilities of each department, the roles inside them, the lead handoff and the operating agreement that makes it work, the combined sales and marketing executive role, how to structure the two teams as you grow, the tools each owns, and copy-ready responsibility lists you can drop into a job description or a resume.
Marketing and Sales: Who Owns What
Here is the split in one view. Read the shared column carefully: the shared middle is where ownership changes hands, and that makes it a common source of avoidable lead loss.

| Marketing owns | Shared | Sales owns |
|---|---|---|
| Brand, positioning, and messaging | The definition of a "qualified lead" | Prospecting and outbound to target accounts |
| Demand generation and campaigns | The lead handoff and follow-up SLA | Discovery calls and demos |
| Content, SEO, and the website | The buyer persona and target account list | Deal pricing, negotiation, and proposals |
| Lead capture and lead scoring | Pipeline and revenue targets | Closing and contracts |
| Marketing-qualified leads (MQLs) | The CRM and shared reporting | New-business conversion (post-sale renewal and expansion ownership varies: Customer Success, Account Management, or sales) |
| Nurturing early-stage interest | Win/loss analysis | Forecasting and quota attainment |
The one-line rule: marketing is accountable for creating and qualifying demand; sales is accountable for converting it. Everything in the shared column needs an explicit agreement between the two, or it falls through the gap.
What the Marketing Department Is Responsible For
The marketing department's job is to make the right buyers aware of the company, interested enough to engage, and qualified enough to hand to sales. In practice that breaks into five core responsibilities.
Demand and lead generation. Attract the right audience through content, SEO, paid media, events, and email, then capture them as leads. Done well, lead generation is the top of the funnel and the department's most measurable output.
Brand and positioning. Decide what the company stands for, who it is for, and how it sounds, then keep that consistent across the website, campaigns, and sales materials. A clear position makes every downstream conversation easier.
Content and enablement. Produce the assets buyers and sales reps use: website copy, blog posts, case studies, comparison pages, and the one-pagers sales sends during a deal.
Market research and strategy. Study the market, the competition, and buyer behavior, then shape the plan and the target segments from what the data shows.
Lead qualification and scoring. Decide which leads are ready for sales using behavior and fit, and pass only those across. This is the responsibility most often skipped, and it is the root of the "marketing sends us junk" complaint.
Who does this work depends on company size. A startup may have one generalist; a larger company splits it into specialists.
| Marketing role | Core responsibility |
|---|---|
| Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) | Owns the strategy, the budget, and marketing's number; aligns with the sales leader |
| Marketing / Demand Gen Manager | Plans and runs campaigns; owns lead volume and cost per lead |
| Content / SEO specialist | Produces the content that attracts and educates buyers |
| Product marketer | Owns positioning, messaging, and sales enablement materials |
| Marketing ops / analyst | Runs the tools, lead scoring, dashboards, and attribution |
What the Sales Department Is Responsible For
The sales department turns interested, qualified buyers into customers and revenue, and in many models also creates its own demand through outbound. Its five core responsibilities:
Prospecting and outbound. Reach target accounts directly, through calls, email, and social, rather than waiting for inbound. Even in inbound-heavy companies, sales owns the proactive outreach to accounts that matter.
Qualifying and discovery. Confirm a lead is a real fit by qualifying the prospect, understand the buyer's problem and buying process, and decide whether to invest time in the deal.
Demos, pricing, and negotiation. Show the product against the buyer's specific needs, handle objections, scope the deal, and agree terms.
Closing and onboarding handoff. Get the signature, then hand a new customer cleanly to onboarding or customer success.
Retention and expansion. Keep accounts, renew them, and grow them. In many B2B companies this is a large share of lifetime revenue.
A note worth keeping in view: reps do not spend most of their week selling. In Salesforce's State of Sales report (6th edition, 2024), reps reported spending only about 30% of their time on actual selling, with the rest going to administrative work, data entry, and internal meetings. A large part of the sales department's structure, especially sales operations, exists to claw that time back.
| Sales role | Core responsibility |
|---|---|
| Sales leader (VP / Director) | Owns the number, the forecast, hiring, and the sales strategy |
| Sales Development Rep (SDR / BDR) | Prospects and qualifies at the top of the funnel; books meetings for AEs |
| Account Executive (AE) | Runs discovery, demos, and negotiation; closes deals |
| Sales operations | Owns the CRM, process, territory and quota design, and reporting |
| Customer success / account manager | Owns retention, renewals, and expansion after the sale |
The Handoff: Where Marketing Ends and Sales Begins
This is the responsibility that lives between the two departments, and the one most companies never assign. A lead does not become a deal at a single moment; it moves through stages, and each stage has an owner. When the owners and the criteria are undefined, good leads go cold and both teams blame the other.
Most models use a short vocabulary for the stages a lead passes through, and the exact definitions vary by company, so the value is in agreeing them rather than in the labels themselves. A marketing-qualified lead (MQL) is someone marketing judges ready for a sales conversation, on fit (do they match the target buyer) and behavior (have they shown real intent). Many teams then add a sales-accepted lead (SAL), the point where a salesperson accepts ownership and commits to work it, and only call it a sales-qualified lead (SQL) once discovery has confirmed a real, pursuable opportunity. Acceptance and qualification are different events, and keeping them separate shows exactly where the handoff breaks.
Not every deal starts as a marketing lead, either. Outbound prospects enter through sales, product-qualified leads (PQLs) enter through product usage, and a direct demo request can route straight to a rep. Treat these as different entry routes into one shared commercial process, rather than forcing every buyer through a single linear funnel.
The point that most often gets missed: a lead is not handed off just because its status changed in the CRM. A handoff works only when someone accepts responsibility for the next action.

Three things make the handoff work, and all three are shared responsibilities, owned by both teams rather than marketing alone:
- A written definition of a qualified lead, agreed by both teams. If marketing and sales cannot state in one sentence what a lead must have before it is passed, every lead is a potential argument.
- A service-level agreement (SLA) on follow-up. Marketing commits to a volume and quality of leads; sales commits to accepting and working them within a set time. Speed matters here: a lead contacted quickly while intent is fresh tends to convert better than one that sits for days.
- A feedback loop. Sales tells marketing which leads converted and which were junk, and marketing uses that to retune scoring. Without the loop, lead quality never improves.
At a minimum, a working handoff agreement names an owner for each of these:
| Element | What both teams agree |
|---|---|
| Qualification | The fit, intent, exclusions, and required data a lead needs before it is passed |
| Assignment | Who the lead routes to, and how quickly |
| Acceptance | How sales accepts or declines ownership, and the time limit to do it |
| Response | When the first real contact attempt must happen |
| Rejection | Standard reason codes, so rejected leads feed back into scoring |
| Recycling | Who takes a not-yet-ready lead back for nurturing |
| Escalation | What happens when no one responds |
A short illustrative example shows why the acceptance line matters. Say a campaign produces 100 MQLs in a month. All 100 route to sales, but only 60 are accepted and worked inside the SLA; of those, 25 reach a real conversation and 8 become opportunities. The headline reads as a lead-volume win and a sales-conversion problem. The acceptance step tells the real story: 40 leads were never worked at all. The fix is rarely more leads. It is tightening the qualification definition so fewer, better leads are passed, and enforcing the acceptance-and-response rule so the ones that are passed actually get worked. (The figures here are illustrative, to show the mechanism, not measured results.)
The Sales and Marketing Executive and Manager Role
Many companies, especially smaller ones and those outside pure tech, fold both functions into a single role: the sales and marketing executive, officer, or manager. The title causes confusion because it spans everything above. Here is what the role actually covers, the skills it needs, and how it is usually paid.
In a combined role, one person (or a small team) carries both sides of the funnel: generate demand, then convert it. Day to day that means running campaigns and content to bring leads in, then prospecting, qualifying, and closing those leads directly. Titles are a rough guide, and the convention is market-dependent: in much of the world an executive or officer is an individual contributor who does the work while a manager also owns the plan, budget, and often a small team, but in some markets "executive" denotes senior leadership. Read the actual responsibilities; the title alone will not tell you.
Here is a copy-ready duty list for the role, for a job description or a resume.
- Plan and run marketing campaigns across content, email, social, and events to generate leads
- Prospect and run outbound to target accounts alongside inbound follow-up
- Qualify leads, run discovery and demos, and close deals
- Maintain the CRM, track the pipeline, and report on leads, conversion, and revenue
- Keep brand and messaging consistent from first touch to close
- Gather market and customer feedback and feed it into strategy
Skills and qualifications. The role rewards breadth over deep specialization: clear communication and writing, comfort with a CRM and basic marketing tools, enough data literacy to read a funnel, and negotiation. Most postings ask for a degree in business or marketing plus some sales or marketing experience, though demonstrated results usually count for more than the exact credential.
How it is paid. Sales-leaning versions carry a base salary plus a variable component tied to revenue (quoted together as on-target earnings, or OTE); marketing-leaning versions are mostly base. Ranges differ widely by region, industry, and seniority, so treat any single quoted figure with caution.
How to Structure the Two Teams
The right structure is not fixed. It changes as the company grows, and the reporting lines matter as much as the responsibility lists. Two questions decide it: how far along is the company, and who owns the number.

The split changes as you grow, usually through four stages:
- Founder-led. The founder or one generalist does both; marketing and sales live on the same person's calendar. The priority is repeatable demand; org design comes later.
- First hires. The right first hire relieves the current constraint, rather than filling a fixed slot on an org chart. If the founder has more qualified conversations than they can handle, hire sales capacity (often an SDR or AE); if few of the right people are discovering the product, hire marketing or growth; if sign-ups stall at activation, the answer may be neither. Responsibilities begin to separate, but one person still spans the handoff.
- Specialized teams. Marketing and sales become distinct teams with their own leaders, metrics, and budgets. This is where the handoff problem appears, and where the shared definitions and SLA above stop being optional.
- Unified revenue org. At scale, many companies put marketing, sales, and customer success under one revenue leader, a chief revenue officer (CRO), with a separate revenue operations (RevOps) function owning the shared systems, data, and forecasting. The CRO leads; RevOps operates. One accountability sits over the whole funnel.
On top of stage, three reporting models are common, each with a trade-off:
- Separate and equal. Marketing and sales each report to the CEO. Simple, but the handoff is a border between two peers, so it only works with explicit agreements.
- One function under the other. Marketing reports into sales, or sales into marketing. Alignment is faster on paper, but the subordinate function's priorities tend to get squeezed.
- Unified under a CRO. Both, often with customer success, report to one revenue owner (a CRO), usually supported by a RevOps function. This gives the cleanest alignment, but it is an investment most small companies do not need yet. RevOps is a capability, not a reporting line in itself: it can sit under a CRO or support otherwise-separate teams.
Match the structure to the stage. Most friction comes from one of two mistakes: running specialized teams with no shared definitions, or adopting a heavy RevOps structure before there is enough volume to justify it.
The Tools Each Team Owns
Responsibilities map to tools, and knowing which team owns which system prevents overlap and the "that's not in my tool" version of finger-pointing.
| Marketing tools | Shared | Sales tools |
|---|---|---|
| Marketing automation and email platform | The CRM, as the shared system of record | Sales engagement and outreach |
| SEO, content, and website tools | Shared dashboards and reporting | Prospecting and data enrichment |
| Analytics and attribution | Lead routing and enrichment | Proposal, quoting, and e-signature |
| Ad platforms and social scheduling | Agreed definitions and stages | Conversation intelligence and call recording |
The CRM is the one system both teams live in. When marketing and sales run on separate tools that do not talk to each other, the handoff and the shared metrics both break, because neither team trusts the other's numbers.
Using a tool and owning it are different things. Someone has to own the configuration: who sets the routing rules, who can change the lead stages, who maintains the integrations, and who investigates missing or duplicate records. In a small team that falls to whoever runs the CRM; as the company grows, it is exactly the work a RevOps function takes on. Leave it unassigned and the shared data quietly degrades until neither team trusts it.
Where the Two Teams Clash (and How to Fix It)
The tension between sales and marketing is structural. The two functions are measured on different timelines and rewarded for different things, so they see the world differently. Research on this goes back decades: Homburg and Jensen, writing in the Journal of Marketing (2007), described sales and marketing as operating in different "thought worlds," with different time horizons and different definitions of success. Marketing thinks in campaigns, quarters, and markets; sales thinks in deals, this month, and individual accounts.
That structural gap shows up as a few recurring fights, each with a concrete fix.
- "Marketing sends us junk leads." Usually true when there is no shared, written lead definition. Fix: agree the qualification criteria together and have sales mark why rejected leads were rejected, so scoring improves.
- "Sales ignores the leads we send." This one label hides several different failures: the lead never reached the CRM, routing sent it to the wrong rep, no one accepted it, it was accepted but never contacted, or it was contacted and went quiet. Fix: diagnose which step actually broke (the handoff agreement above makes each step visible), then set a two-way SLA and the feedback loop. The same SLA is not the right answer to all five.
- "We don't know what's working." Happens when the two teams track different metrics in different tools. Fix: one shared pipeline view and a short list of metrics both teams own (below).
- "Whose number is this?" The deepest one. Fix: give both teams a shared revenue or pipeline goal that both carry, instead of a separate marketing lead target and sales quota, so neither can hit its number while the company misses. A shared goal still needs stage-level ownership underneath it (demand created, leads accepted, meetings held, deals qualified), or a shared number just spreads the blame instead of assigning it.
Companies increasingly put both functions, and often customer success, under one revenue leader, a chief revenue officer (CRO), with a revenue operations (RevOps) team owning the shared data, systems, and process underneath. The CRO is the single accountability; RevOps is the operating function that makes one view of the funnel possible. The point is to replace two owners who meet at a contested border with one owner over the whole thing.
The Metrics Both Teams Share
Shared responsibilities need shared numbers. When marketing is measured only on lead volume and sales only on closed deals, each can succeed while the company stalls. These are the metrics that sit across the boundary.
| Metric | What it measures | Why both teams own it |
|---|---|---|
| Lead acceptance rate (MQL to SAL) | Share of marketing leads sales accepts and works | A direct test of lead quality and of the shared definition, separate from whether those leads later qualify |
| Lead-to-customer rate | Share of leads that become customers | The end-to-end funnel both teams influence |
| Customer acquisition cost (CAC) | Total sales and marketing cost per new customer | Spans both budgets, so neither owns it alone |
| Pipeline created and coverage | Value of open opportunities vs the target | Marketing feeds it; sales converts it |
| Win rate | Share of qualified deals won | Reflects lead quality and selling quality together |
| Retention and expansion | Revenue kept and grown after the sale | Where much of lifetime value is won or lost |
Pick a small set and make them visible to both teams in one place. The point is not to track everything; it is to remove the scoreboard that lets one team win while the other loses.
Copy-Ready Responsibility Lists
If you are writing a job description, structuring a team, or building a resume, here are clean responsibility lists you can adapt. Keep what fits the role and cut the rest.
Marketing department responsibilities
- Plan and run demand-generation campaigns across content, SEO, paid, email, and events
- Own brand, positioning, and consistent messaging across all channels
- Produce content and sales-enablement assets (website, blog, case studies, one-pagers)
- Conduct market and competitor research to shape strategy and target segments
- Capture, score, and qualify leads, and pass marketing-qualified leads to sales
- Own marketing tools, lead scoring, dashboards, and attribution reporting
Sales department responsibilities
- Prospect and run outbound to target accounts
- Qualify leads and run discovery to confirm fit and buying intent
- Deliver demos, scope deals, and handle pricing and negotiation
- Close deals and hand new customers cleanly to onboarding
- Retain, renew, and expand existing accounts
- Keep the CRM current and forecast the pipeline accurately
For the combined sales and marketing executive role common in smaller companies, use the copy-ready duty list in the executive-role section above.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the responsibilities of a sales and marketing department?
Marketing is responsible for brand, demand generation, content, and qualifying leads; sales is responsible for prospecting, discovery, negotiation, closing, and retention. The two share the lead handoff, the definition of a qualified lead, and the revenue target.
What are the five main functions of a marketing department?
Demand and lead generation, brand and positioning, content and enablement, market research and strategy, and lead qualification and scoring.
What are the five main duties of a sales representative?
Prospecting and outreach, qualifying and discovery, running demos and negotiating, closing deals, and maintaining accounts in the CRM. Reps also keep their forecast current so the team can plan.
What is the difference between a marketing department and a sales department?
Marketing works one-to-many to create and qualify demand across a market; sales works one-to-one to convert individual qualified buyers into customers. Marketing is measured on leads and pipeline created, sales on revenue closed.
Who should own lead generation, sales or marketing?
Both, at different stages. Marketing owns inbound lead generation at scale; sales owns outbound prospecting to specific target accounts. The two should agree on one shared definition of a qualified lead so the handoff between them is clean.
What is a sales and marketing executive?
A combined role that carries both sides of the funnel: generating demand through campaigns and content, then prospecting, qualifying, and closing leads directly. The "executive" or "officer" title usually means an individual contributor; "manager" adds ownership of the plan, the budget, and often a small team.
What skills does a sales and marketing executive need?
Clear communication and writing, comfort with a CRM and basic marketing tools, enough data literacy to read a funnel, negotiation and objection handling, and the organization to run top-of-funnel and bottom-of-funnel work in the same week. Breadth matters more than deep specialization in any single channel.
What are the 5 P's of marketing?
The marketing mix: the classic four, product, price, place, and promotion, usually extended with a fifth, people. They shape marketing strategy and sit underneath the demand-generation work, rather than describing the department's day-to-day responsibilities.
Should sales and marketing be one team or two?
It depends on stage. Small companies usually combine them in one role; as volume grows they split into specialized teams; at scale many reunify both (plus customer success) under a single revenue leader. The structure should follow the company's size, not the other way around.
The One Thing to Get Right
You can draw the responsibility lines many ways, and different companies reasonably split them differently. The rule that holds across all of them is simpler than any org chart: every transfer of responsibility needs a clear owner, an acceptance rule, and a defined next action. The marketing-to-sales handoff is usually the first and most visible test of that discipline, but the same logic governs the sales-to-onboarding and the activation boundaries too. Get those transfers right and the teams reinforce each other. Leave them vague and no reporting structure will save you.






































































































